Workflow · Moderate effort
Research to a brief
Turn a defined research question into a source-backed brief that supports a decision.
Opens the tool in a new tab. Sign-in or a plan may be required there. Follow the steps below and return to check your result.
Step by step
Here’s how to do it
Work through these steps in order. Your notes stay on this page until you copy them; nothing runs automatically.
What you’ll need
- The question and decision the research will support.
- A date range, scope and authorised source set or search boundaries.
Write the question to answer
- Write the decision this research should help someone make.
- Set the topic, audience, date range and any limits so the search has a clear stopping point.
- In ChatGPT, paste the prompt below with this step’s source material, then send it. Review the answer before carrying it forward.
Prepare your prompt
Add your details, then copy the prepared prompt into the tool. This helper combines your text with the task instructions.
View prepared prompt
Help turn this request into one answerable research question. State the decision it informs, audience, date range and scope. Flag missing limits rather than inventing them. Requested output format: Finding | Evidence | Source | Uncertainty
- Start with
- Request/context.
- You’ll have
- Decision question.
Find relevant sources
- Search for material that directly addresses your question. Prefer original or first-party sources for factual claims.
- Keep each useful link, publisher and date in a source list.
- Start with
- Decision question.
- You’ll have
- Candidate sources.
Choose the sources to compareOptional
- Open the candidate sources and check that they cover the right topic, organisation and time period.
- Set aside duplicates, irrelevant pages and sources you cannot verify. Record important gaps.
- Start with
- Candidate sources.
- You’ll have
- Selected source set.
Record the facts with their sources
- Use a table to capture each relevant fact or theme beside its source link and date.
- Keep quotations distinct from your notes. Record contradictions rather than choosing silently between them.
- In ChatGPT, paste the prompt below with this step’s source material, then send it. Review the answer before carrying it forward.
Prepare your prompt
Add your details, then copy the prepared prompt into the tool. This helper combines your text with the task instructions.
View prepared prompt
Extract facts relevant to the research question from the supplied source extracts. Use a table: Claim | Source URL | Date | Supporting passage | Limitation. Record contradictions. Do not fill gaps with outside knowledge. Requested output format: Finding | Evidence | Source | Uncertainty
- Start with
- Source set.
- You’ll have
- Evidence table or structured notes.
Explain what the evidence means
- Group the findings into confirmed facts, uncertainty and implications for the decision.
- Explain how each conclusion follows from the evidence. Keep unsupported possibilities clearly labelled.
- In Claude, paste the prompt below with this step’s source material, then send it. Review the answer before carrying it forward.
Prepare your prompt
Add your details, then copy the prepared prompt into the tool. This helper combines your text with the task instructions.
View prepared prompt
Use this evidence table to explain the main findings and their implications for the decision. Separate supported facts, uncertain points and interpretation. Cite the source IDs for every important conclusion. Requested output format: Finding | Evidence | Source | Uncertainty
- Start with
- Evidence table.
- You’ll have
- Findings and implications.
Claude’s file guide (opens in a new tab) · Checked
Write the research brief
- Start with the decision question and the findings that matter most.
- Add the implications, unresolved questions and a dated source list so the reader can check the work.
- Start with
- Synthesis plus sources.
- You’ll have
- Final brief.
0 of 6 step checks complete. The brief answers the original decision question, separates evidence from inference and identifies next actions or remaining unknowns.
Before you share or switch it on
- Open and check the material source links.
- Check dates, identity and contradictory claims.
- Approve conclusions and retain a dated source list.
03 · Tools used
Tool roles, with choice kept visible
Optional
No optional tool is included in this setup.
01 · What this workflow helps you do
A structured brief containing findings, evidence, uncertainty, implications and recommended follow-up.
Gather and synthesise relevant evidence without producing an unstructured pile of links.
A structured brief containing findings, evidence, uncertainty, implications and recommended follow-up.
Complete when: The brief answers the original decision question, separates evidence from inference and identifies next actions or remaining unknowns.02 · What you need
Start with the available source material
- Research Question
- Decision To Inform
- Target Entities/Topic
- Geography/Time Period/Constraints
- Source Standards Where Relevant
05 · Human checks
Keep judgement with the person doing the work
- Human confirms the real decision.
- Assess source quality rather than assuming it.
- Exclude weak or irrelevant material.
- Keep citations with claims.
- Separate inference from evidence.
- Verify material citations and freshness.
06 · Limitations
Where this workflow needs care
- Retrieval tools can miss or misread sources.
- Important citations must be checked.
- Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
- Time-sensitive claims need freshness.
07 · Related workflows